lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:28:10 -0800 From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fw@...len.de, kishen.maloor@...el.com, dcaratti@...hat.com, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net 4/4] mptcp: use proper req destructor for IPv6 From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net> Before, only the destructor from TCP request sock in IPv4 was called even if the subflow was IPv6. It is important to use the right destructor to avoid memory leaks with some advanced IPv6 features, e.g. when the request socks contain specific IPv6 options. Fixes: 79c0949e9a09 ("mptcp: Add key generation and token tree") Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com> --- Note: One original author of 79c0949e9a09 is not cc'd due to inactive email address. --- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 30524dd7d0ec..613f515fedf0 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ static void subflow_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req) sock_put((struct sock *)subflow_req->msk); mptcp_token_destroy_request(req); - tcp_request_sock_ops.destructor(req); } static void subflow_generate_hmac(u64 key1, u64 key2, u32 nonce1, u32 nonce2, @@ -550,6 +549,12 @@ static int subflow_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) return 0; } +static void subflow_v4_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req) +{ + subflow_req_destructor(req); + tcp_request_sock_ops.destructor(req); +} + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6) static struct request_sock_ops mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops __ro_after_init; static struct tcp_request_sock_ops subflow_request_sock_ipv6_ops __ro_after_init; @@ -581,6 +586,12 @@ static int subflow_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) tcp_listendrop(sk); return 0; /* don't send reset */ } + +static void subflow_v6_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req) +{ + subflow_req_destructor(req); + tcp6_request_sock_ops.destructor(req); +} #endif struct request_sock *mptcp_subflow_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops, @@ -1929,8 +1940,6 @@ static int subflow_ops_init(struct request_sock_ops *subflow_ops) if (!subflow_ops->slab) return -ENOMEM; - subflow_ops->destructor = subflow_req_destructor; - return 0; } @@ -1938,6 +1947,8 @@ void __init mptcp_subflow_init(void) { mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops = tcp_request_sock_ops; mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops.slab_name = "request_sock_subflow_v4"; + mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops.destructor = subflow_v4_req_destructor; + if (subflow_ops_init(&mptcp_subflow_v4_request_sock_ops) != 0) panic("MPTCP: failed to init subflow v4 request sock ops\n"); @@ -1963,6 +1974,8 @@ void __init mptcp_subflow_init(void) mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops = tcp6_request_sock_ops; mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops.slab_name = "request_sock_subflow_v6"; + mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops.destructor = subflow_v6_req_destructor; + if (subflow_ops_init(&mptcp_subflow_v6_request_sock_ops) != 0) panic("MPTCP: failed to init subflow v6 request sock ops\n"); -- 2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists