netdev - Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2022-12-09

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 13:56:36 -0800
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2022-12-09

Hi Jakub,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:36 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri,  9 Dec 2022 17:34:56 -0800 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > bluetooth-next pull request for net-next:
> >
> >  - Add a new VID/PID 0489/e0f2 for MT7922
> >  - Add Realtek RTL8852BE support ID 0x0cb8:0xc559
> >  - Add a new PID/VID 13d3/3549 for RTL8822CU
> >  - Add support for broadcom BCM43430A0 & BCM43430A1
> >  - Add CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_POLL_SYNC
> >  - Add CONFIG_BT_LE_L2CAP_ECRED
> >  - Add support for CYW4373A0
> >  - Add support for RTL8723DS
> >  - Add more device IDs for WCN6855
> >  - Add Broadcom BCM4377 family PCIe Bluetooth
>
> Hm, it's pulling in the commits we merged into net and which
> are already present in net-next but with a different hash/id.
>
> With a small overlap which git can't figure out:
>
> diff --cc drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index f05018988a17,2ad4efdd9e40..24a8ed3f0458
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@@ -2052,17 -2206,17 +2206,22 @@@ static int btusb_setup_csr(struct hci_d
>                 bt_dev_err(hdev, "CSR: Local version length mismatch");
>                 kfree_skb(skb);
>                 return -EIO;
>         }
>
> -       rp = (struct hci_rp_read_local_version *)skb->data;
> +       bt_dev_info(hdev, "CSR: Setting up dongle with HCI ver=%u rev=%04x",
> +                   rp->hci_ver, le16_to_cpu(rp->hci_rev));
> +
> +       bt_dev_info(hdev, "LMP ver=%u subver=%04x; manufacturer=%u",
> +                   rp->lmp_ver, le16_to_cpu(rp->lmp_subver),
> +                   le16_to_cpu(rp->manufacturer));
>
>  +      bt_dev_info(hdev, "CSR: Setting up dongle with HCI ver=%u rev=%04x; LMP ver=%u subver=%04x; manufacturer=%u",
>  +              le16_to_cpu(rp->hci_ver), le16_to_cpu(rp->hci_rev),
>  +              le16_to_cpu(rp->lmp_ver), le16_to_cpu(rp->lmp_subver),
>  +              le16_to_cpu(rp->manufacturer));
>  +
>
> Could you rebase on top of net-next and resend so that the commits
> which are already applied disappear?

Sure, I will resend it shortly.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz