netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: apple: mace: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:00:15 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: apple: mace: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under
 spin_lock_irqsave()

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 21:37:34 +0800 you wrote:
> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware
> interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled.
> 
> It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
> The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means
> the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB
> is consumed in normal.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v3,1/2] net: apple: mace: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/3dfe3486c1cd
  - [net,v3,2/2] net: apple: bmac: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/5fe02e046e64

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html