netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: pn533: Clear nfc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:22:20 +0900
From:   Minsuk Kang <linuxlovemin@...sei.ac.kr>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linma@....edu.cn, davem@...emloft.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
        linville@...driver.com, dokyungs@...sei.ac.kr,
        jisoo.jang@...sei.ac.kr, Minsuk Kang <linuxlovemin@...sei.ac.kr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: pn533: Clear nfc_target before being used

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:05:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/12/2022 17:03, Minsuk Kang wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 03:41:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 13/12/2022 15:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 13/12/2022 15:27, Minsuk Kang wrote:
> >>>> Fix a slab-out-of-bounds read that occurs in nla_put() called from
> >>>> nfc_genl_send_target() when target->sensb_res_len, which is duplicated
> >>>> from an nfc_target in pn533, is too large as the nfc_target is not
> >>>> properly initialized and retains garbage values. Clear nfc_targets with
> >>>> memset() before they are used.
> >>>>
> >>>> Found by a modified version of syzkaller.
> >>>>
> >>>> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nla_put
> >>>> Call Trace:
> >>>>  memcpy
> >>>>  nla_put
> >>>>  nfc_genl_dump_targets
> >>>>  genl_lock_dumpit
> >>>>  netlink_dump
> >>>>  __netlink_dump_start
> >>>>  genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit
> >>>>  genl_rcv_msg
> >>>>  netlink_rcv_skb
> >>>>  genl_rcv
> >>>>  netlink_unicast
> >>>>  netlink_sendmsg
> >>>>  sock_sendmsg
> >>>>  ____sys_sendmsg
> >>>>  ___sys_sendmsg
> >>>>  __sys_sendmsg
> >>>>  do_syscall_64
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 673088fb42d0 ("NFC: pn533: Send ATR_REQ directly for active device detection")
> >>>> Fixes: 361f3cb7f9cf ("NFC: DEP link hook implementation for pn533")
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>>
> >>> How did it happen? From where did you get it?
> >>
> >> I double checked - I did not send it. This is some fake tag. Please do
> >> not add fake/invented/created tags with people's names.
> > 
> > Sorry for my confusion.
> > 
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L505
> > 
> > I missed the definition of the tag as I did not read the document
> > carefully and misunderstood that the tag simply means I have got a
> > reply from maintainers and I should manually attach it if that is
> > the case. I will rewrite the patch after I make sure I fully
> > understand the whole rules.
> 
> The document says:
> "By offering my Reviewed-by: tag, I state that:"
> 
> You need to receive it explicitly from the reviewer. Once received, but
> only then, add to the patch.

Thank you for your comment.
I won't forget it.

Best regards,
Minsuk