[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221213195551.iev4u5niyzvyflyc@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 21:55:51 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, claudiu.manoil@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFT] net: ethernet: enetc: do not always access skb_shared_info
in the XDP path
Hi Lorenzo,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:46:43AM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Move XDP skb_shared_info structure initialization in from
> enetc_map_rx_buff_to_xdp() to enetc_add_rx_buff_to_xdp() and do not always
> access skb_shared_info in the xdp_buff/xdp_frame since it is located in a
> different cacheline with respect to hard_start and data xdp pointers.
> Rely on XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS flag to check if it really necessary to access
> non-linear part of the xdp_buff/xdp_frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> ---
> This patch is based on the following series not applied yet to next-next:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/cover.1670680119.git.lorenzo@kernel.org/
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index cd8f5f0c6b54..2ed6b163f3c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -1305,6 +1305,10 @@ static int enetc_xdp_frame_to_xdp_tx_swbd(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring,
> xdp_tx_swbd->xdp_frame = NULL;
>
> n++;
> +
> + if (!xdp_frame_has_frags(xdp_frame))
> + goto out;
> +
Tested this with single-buffer devmap XDP_REDIRECT, can't test with
multi-buffer I think.
> xdp_tx_swbd = &xdp_tx_arr[n];
>
> shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdp_frame);
> @@ -1334,7 +1338,7 @@ static int enetc_xdp_frame_to_xdp_tx_swbd(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring,
> n++;
> xdp_tx_swbd = &xdp_tx_arr[n];
> }
> -
> +out:
> xdp_tx_arr[n - 1].is_eof = true;
> xdp_tx_arr[n - 1].xdp_frame = xdp_frame;
>
> @@ -1390,16 +1394,12 @@ static void enetc_map_rx_buff_to_xdp(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i,
> {
> struct enetc_rx_swbd *rx_swbd = enetc_get_rx_buff(rx_ring, i, size);
> void *hard_start = page_address(rx_swbd->page) + rx_swbd->page_offset;
> - struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
>
> /* To be used for XDP_TX */
> rx_swbd->len = size;
>
> xdp_prepare_buff(xdp_buff, hard_start - rx_ring->buffer_offset,
> rx_ring->buffer_offset, size, false);
> -
> - shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp_buff);
> - shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
> }
>
> static void enetc_add_rx_buff_to_xdp(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i,
> @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static void enetc_add_rx_buff_to_xdp(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i,
> {
> struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp_buff);
> struct enetc_rx_swbd *rx_swbd = enetc_get_rx_buff(rx_ring, i, size);
> - skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags];
> + skb_frag_t *frag;
>
> /* To be used for XDP_TX */
> rx_swbd->len = size;
> @@ -1415,6 +1415,7 @@ static void enetc_add_rx_buff_to_xdp(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i,
> if (!xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp_buff)) {
> xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp_buff);
> shinfo->xdp_frags_size = size;
> + shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
Tested this and enetc_map_rx_buff_to_xdp() with single-buffer and
multi-buffer XDP_TX.
> } else {
> shinfo->xdp_frags_size += size;
> }
> @@ -1422,6 +1423,7 @@ static void enetc_add_rx_buff_to_xdp(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i,
> if (page_is_pfmemalloc(rx_swbd->page))
> xdp_buff_set_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp_buff);
>
> + frag = &shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags];
> skb_frag_off_set(frag, rx_swbd->page_offset);
> skb_frag_size_set(frag, size);
> __skb_frag_set_page(frag, rx_swbd->page);
> --
> 2.38.1
>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists