[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALDO+SaoW5XoroBMoYLWsqCvYYVkKiTFFPMTLUEt7Qu5rQ+z3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:55:43 -0800
From: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, tuc@...are.com, gyang@...are.com,
doshir@...are.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5] vmxnet3: Add XDP support.
Thanks for taking a look at this patch!
<...>
>
> > +int
> > +vmxnet3_process_xdp(struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter,
> > + struct vmxnet3_rx_queue *rq,
> > + struct Vmxnet3_RxCompDesc *rcd,
> > + struct vmxnet3_rx_buf_info *rbi,
> > + struct Vmxnet3_RxDesc *rxd,
> > + bool *need_flush)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> > + dma_addr_t new_dma_addr;
> > + struct sk_buff *new_skb;
> > + bool rxDataRingUsed;
> > + int ret, act;
> > +
> > + ret = VMXNET3_XDP_CONTINUE;
> > + if (unlikely(rcd->len == 0))
> > + return VMXNET3_XDP_TAKEN;
> > +
> > + rxDataRingUsed = VMXNET3_RX_DATA_RING(adapter, rcd->rqID);
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_bpf_prog);
> > + if (!xdp_prog) {
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + return VMXNET3_XDP_CONTINUE;
> > + }
> > + act = vmxnet3_run_xdp(rq, rbi, rcd, need_flush, rxDataRingUsed);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + switch (act) {
> > + case XDP_PASS:
> > + ret = VMXNET3_XDP_CONTINUE;
> > + break;
> > + case XDP_DROP:
> > + case XDP_TX:
> > + case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > + case XDP_ABORTED:
> > + default:
> > + /* Reuse and remap the existing buffer. */
> > + ret = VMXNET3_XDP_TAKEN;
> > + if (rxDataRingUsed)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + new_skb = rbi->skb;
> > + new_dma_addr =
> > + dma_map_single(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> > + new_skb->data, rbi->len,
> > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > + if (dma_mapping_error(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> > + new_dma_addr)) {
> > + dev_kfree_skb(new_skb);
> > + rq->stats.drop_total++;
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + rbi->dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
> > + rxd->addr = cpu_to_le64(rbi->dma_addr);
> > + rxd->len = rbi->len;
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> FOr XDP_DROP and XDP_ABORTED this makes sense. You might want to add a
> trace point in the case of aborted just so you can catch such cases for
> debug.
Good point, I will add the trace point.
>
> However for XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT shouldn't both of those be calling
> out to seperate functions to either place the frame on a Tx ring or to
> hand it off to xdp_do_redirect so that the frame gets routed where it
> needs to go? Also don't you run a risk with overwriting frames that
> might be waiting on transmit?
Yes, I have XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT handled in another function,
the vmxnet3_run_xdp() and __vmxnet3_run_xdp().
How do I avoid overwriting frames that might be waiting on transmit?
I checked my vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back and vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame,
I think since I called the vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame at the rx context,
it should be ok?
Thanks
William
Powered by blists - more mailing lists