[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221215153753.GA7408@pc-4.home>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 16:37:53 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Christoph Böhmwalder
<christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/3] Treewide: Stop corrupting socket's task_frag
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:36:52PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
>
> Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Maybe setting sk_use_task_frag in fs/afs/rxrpc.c was overzealous but
> > I'm not familiar enough with the AF_RXRPC family to tell. If AF_RXRPC
> > sockets can't call sk_page_frag() and have no reason to do so in the
> > future, then it should be safe to drop this chunk.
>
> As of this merge window, AF_RXRPC doesn't actually allocate sk_buffs apart
> from when it calls skb_unshare(). It does steal the incoming sk_buffs from
> the UDP socket it uses as a transport, but they're allocated in the IP/IP6
> stack somewhere.
>
> The UDP transport socket, on the other hand, will allocate sk_buffs for
> transmission, but rxrpc sends an entire UDP packet at a time, each with a
> single sendmsg call.
>
> Further, this mostly now moved such that the UDP sendmsg calls are performed
> inside an I/O thread. The application thread does not interact directly with
> the UDP transport socket.
>
> David
Thanks for the explanations. Looks like we could drop the fs/afs/rxrpc.c
chunk then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists