netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 vfio 0/7] pds vfio driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4438c3bc-0bb2-becb-48ad-4e85f79f240f@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:22:36 -0800
From:   Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com, jgg@...dia.com,
        yishaih@...dia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, shannon.nelson@....com, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 vfio 0/7] pds vfio driver

On 12/14/2022 10:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> just as said last time and completely ignored by you:  any nvme live
> migration needs to be standardized in the NVMe technical working group
> before it can be merged in Linux.

Hey Christoph,

I'm not trying to ignore you and that's why this series is still marked 
RFC. I appreciate the feedback, regardless of the end result.

I am paying attention to the other thread on the KVM mailing list and do 
understand your stance on the topic.

Thanks,

Brett