netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 01/15] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y5w15tZ68q/Sjap1@nanopsycho>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:09:58 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 01/15] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory

Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 08:48:29PM CET, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:29:02 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote:
>> >> What's "basic" about it? It sounds a bit misleading.  
>> > 
>> > Agreed, but try to suggest a better name ;)  the_rest_of_it.c ? :)
>> 
>> I tried to think of something, but you already use core elsewhere in the
>> series. If our long term goal really is to split everything out then
>> maybe "leftover.c"? Or just "devlink/devlink.c"
>
>leftover.c is fine by me. Jiri?

If the goal is to remove the file entirely eventually, I'm okay with
that.