lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:35:38 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] test/vsock: vsock_perf utility

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:23:46AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds utility to check vsock rx/tx performance.
>
>Usage as sender:
>./vsock_perf --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes <bytes to send>
>Usage as receiver:
>./vsock_perf --port <port> --rcvlowat <SO_RCVLOWAT>
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>---
> tools/testing/vsock/Makefile     |   3 +-
> tools/testing/vsock/README       |  34 +++
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 441 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>index f8293c6910c9..43a254f0e14d 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/Makefile
>@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>-all: test
>+all: test vsock_perf
> test: vsock_test vsock_diag_test
> vsock_test: vsock_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
> vsock_diag_test: vsock_diag_test.o timeout.o control.o util.o
>+vsock_perf: vsock_perf.o
>
> CFLAGS += -g -O2 -Werror -Wall -I. -I../../include -I../../../usr/include -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -MMD -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
> .PHONY: all test clean
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/README b/tools/testing/vsock/README
>index 4d5045e7d2c3..e6f6735bba05 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/README
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/README
>@@ -35,3 +35,37 @@ Invoke test binaries in both directions as follows:
>                        --control-port=$GUEST_IP \
>                        --control-port=1234 \
>                        --peer-cid=3
>+
>+vsock_perf utility
>+-------------------
>+'vsock_perf' is a simple tool to measure vsock performance. It works in
>+sender/receiver modes: sender connect to peer at the specified port and
>+starts data transmission to the receiver. After data processing is done,
>+it prints several metrics(see below).
>+
>+Usage:
>+# run as sender
>+# connect to CID 2, port 1234, send 1G of data, tx buf size is 1M
>+./vsock_perf --sender 2 --port 1234 --bytes 1G --buf-size 1M
>+
>+Output:
>+tx performance: A Gb/s
>+
>+Output explanation:
>+A is calculated as "number of bytes to send" / "time in tx loop"
>+
>+# run as receiver
>+# listen port 1234, rx buf size is 1M, socket buf size is 1G, SO_RCVLOWAT is 64K
>+./vsock_perf --port 1234 --buf-size 1M --vsk-size 1G --rcvlowat 64K
>+
>+Output:
>+rx performance: A Gb/s
>+total in 'read()': B sec
>+POLLIN wakeups: C
>+average in 'read()': D ns
>+
>+Output explanation:
>+A is calculated as "number of received bytes" / "time in rx loop".
>+B is time, spent in 'read()' system call(excluding 'poll()')
>+C is number of 'poll()' wake ups with POLLIN bit set.
>+D is B / C, e.g. average amount of time, spent in single 'read()'.

Since now we prints Gbits/s I think we should update the previous lines.
But the rest looks good to me. So with the updated README:

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>

Thanks,
Stefano

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ