netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] netdev doc de-FAQization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3cb81f46-ac18-061f-8664-3b96e8c8165c@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:35:01 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] netdev doc de-FAQization



On 12/21/22 10:40, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I've been tempted to do this for a while. I think that we have outgrown
> the FAQ format for our process doc. I'm curious what others think but
> I often find myself struggling to locate information in this doc,
> because the questions do not serve well as section headers.
> 
> Jakub Kicinski (2):
>   docs: netdev: reshuffle sections in prep for de-FAQization
>   docs: netdev: convert to a non-FAQ document
> 
>  Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 363 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 196 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Jakub,

Yes, I prefer it this way instead of the FAQ format, so for
both patches:

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

-- 
~Randy