lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:10:58 +0200 From: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: send notification coalescing command only if value changed > We'll always just do 2 commands, right? This is my point, we are sending 2 commands at the moment, even though one of them may be unnecessary. > E.g. if a card lost the config resending it might help fix things. How can it lose the config? We can say the same about every command sent through the control vq. > I don't think we should bother at this point. Ok, I'll drop it. Alvaro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists