[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544202ef-37f8-9055-7f2e-69fa46907930@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:20:01 +0200
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com,
syzkaller@...glegroups.com, liuhangbin@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joneslee@...gle.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __skb_gso_segment
On 21.12.2022 14:41, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:42:59AM +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21.12.2022 09:37, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I added Greg KH to the thread, maybe he can shed some light on whether
>>>> new support can be marked as fixes and backported to stable. The rules
>>>> on what kind of patches are accepted into the -stable tree don't mention
>>>> new support:
>>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>>>
>>> As you say, we don't take new features into older kernels. Unless they
>>> fix a reported problem, if so, submit the git ids to us and we will be
>>> glad to review them.
>>>
>>
>> They do fix a bug. I'm taking care of it. Shall I update
>> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst to mention this rule as
>> well?
>
> How exactly would you change it, and why?
Something like this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20221222091658.1975240-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/T/#u
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists