netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/17] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKH8qBsrbC7C5SxVzZh+qzqN6eb5yQ5K70-9PAudHJsrLQ0O9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 20:06:30 -0800
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/17] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:31 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 12/20/22 2:20 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > index bafcb7a3ae6f..6d81b14361e3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > @@ -2097,6 +2097,14 @@ bool bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
> >       if (fp->kprobe_override)
> >               return false;
> >
> > +     /* XDP programs inserted into maps are not guaranteed to run on
> > +      * a particular netdev (and can run outside driver context entirely
> > +      * in the case of devmap and cpumap). Until device checks
> > +      * are implemented, prohibit adding dev-bound programs to program maps.
> > +      */
> > +     if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(fp->aux))
> > +             return false;
> > +
>
> There is a recent change in the same function in the bpf tree, commit
> 1c123c567fb1. fyi.

Thanks for the heads up; looks like it won't conflict, right?

> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index fdfdcab4a59d..320451a0be3e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -2081,6 +2081,22 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, s16 offset)
> >       return btf_vmlinux ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> >   }
> >
> > +int bpf_dev_bound_kfunc_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> > +                           struct bpf_prog_aux *prog_aux)
>
> nit. Move the dev bound related function to offload.c. &env->log can be passed
> instead of env and then use bpf_log().

Sure, SG!

> Others lgtm.
>