netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] wl18xx: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y1qyiqc9.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2022 08:31:02 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xu.panda@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wl18xx: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

<yang.yang29@....com.cn> writes:

> From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl18xx/main.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. Also always Cc
linux-wireless list, more info in the wiki link below.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches