[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0126685-10ea-eab6-9b05-53cb30103da2@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:30:52 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] virtio_net: transmit the multi-buffer xdp
在 2022/12/27 16:26, Heng Qi 写道:
>
>
> 在 2022/12/27 下午3:12, Jason Wang 写道:
>>
>> 在 2022/12/20 22:14, Heng Qi 写道:
>>> This serves as the basis for XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT
>>> to send a multi-buffer xdp_frame.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> index 40bc58fa57f5..9f31bfa7f9a6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> @@ -563,22 +563,39 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct
>>> virtnet_info *vi,
>>> struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
>>> {
>>> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
>>> - int err;
>>> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
>>> + u8 nr_frags = 0;
>>> + int err, i;
>>> if (unlikely(xdpf->headroom < vi->hdr_len))
>>> return -EOVERFLOW;
>>> - /* Make room for virtqueue hdr (also change xdpf->headroom?) */
>>> + if (unlikely(xdp_frame_has_frags(xdpf))) {
>>> + shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdpf);
>>> + nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Need to adjust this to calculate the correct postion
>>> + * for shinfo of the xdpf.
>>> + */
>>> + xdpf->headroom -= vi->hdr_len;
>>
>>
>> Any reason we need to do this here? (Or if it is, is it only needed
>> for multibuffer XDP?)
>
> Going back to its wrapping function virtnet_xdp_xmit(), we need to
> free up the pending old buffers.
> If the "is_xdp_frame(ptr)" condition is met, then we need to calculate
> the position of skb_shared_info
> in xdp_get_frame_len() and xdp_return_frame(), which will involve to
> xdpf->data and xdpf->headroom.
> Therefore, we need to update the value of headroom synchronously here.
Let's tweak the comment above to something like this.
With that fixed,
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Thanks
>
> Also, it's not necessary for single-buffer xdp, but we need to keep it
> because it's harmless and as it should be.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> Other looks good.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>> xdpf->data -= vi->hdr_len;
>>> /* Zero header and leave csum up to XDP layers */
>>> hdr = xdpf->data;
>>> memset(hdr, 0, vi->hdr_len);
>>> xdpf->len += vi->hdr_len;
>>> - sg_init_one(sq->sg, xdpf->data, xdpf->len);
>>> + sg_init_table(sq->sg, nr_frags + 1);
>>> + sg_set_buf(sq->sg, xdpf->data, xdpf->len);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_frags; i++) {
>>> + skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
>>> +
>>> + sg_set_page(&sq->sg[i + 1], skb_frag_page(frag),
>>> + skb_frag_size(frag), skb_frag_off(frag));
>>> + }
>>> - err = virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, 1, xdp_to_ptr(xdpf),
>>> - GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> + err = virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, nr_frags + 1,
>>> + xdp_to_ptr(xdpf), GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> if (unlikely(err))
>>> return -ENOSPC; /* Caller handle free/refcnt */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists