netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,orion-mdio: Fix examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2022 16:00:40 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Michał Grzelak <mig@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        upstream@...ihalf.com, mw@...ihalf.com, mchl.grzlk@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,orion-mdio: Fix examples

On 29/12/2022 15:51, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/12/2022 15:22, Michał Grzelak wrote:
>>> As stated in marvell-orion-mdio.txt deleted in commit 0781434af811f
>>> ("dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema") if
>>> 'interrupts' property is present, width of 'reg' should be 0x84.
>>> Otherwise, width of 'reg' should be 0x4. Fix 'examples:' and add
>>> constraints checking whether 'interrupts' property is present
>>> and validate it against fixed values in reg.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <mig@...ihalf.com>
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
>> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
>> version they apply.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> Deletion of tag wasn't on purpose, it was done by accident. Would you
> like me to resend the patch with it being added, or leave it as is?

No need, I added it here, so will be picked-up by maintainers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof