| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <trinity-ace28b50-2929-4af3-9dd2-765f848c4d99-1672408565903@3c-app-gmx-bap18>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:56:05 +0100
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Aw: Re: [PATCH net v3 4/5] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: drop
generic vlan rx offload, only use DSA untagging
Hi
thanks for fast response
> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Dezember 2022 um 13:56 Uhr
> Von: "Felix Fietkau" <nbd@....name>
> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "John Crispin" <john@...ozen.org>, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, "Mark Lee" <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>, "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: Aw: [PATCH net v3 4/5] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: drop generic vlan rx offload, only use DSA untagging
>
> On 30.12.22 12:46, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > v2 or v3 seems to break vlan on mt7986 over eth0 (mt7531 switch). v1 was working on next from end of November. But my rebased tree with v1 on 6.2-rc1 has same issue, so something after next 2711 was added which break vlan over mt7531.
> >
> > Directly over eth1 it works (was not working before).
> >
> > if i made no mistake there is still something wrong.
> >
> > btw. mt7622/r64 can also use second gmac (over vlan aware bridge with aux-port of switch to wan-port) it is only not default in mainline. But maybe this should not be used as decision for dropping "dsa-tag" (wrongly vlan-tag).
> >
> > regards Frank
> Thanks for reporting.
> Please try this patch on top of the series:
> ---
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -3218,10 +3218,8 @@ static int mtk_open(struct net_device *dev)
> phylink_start(mac->phylink);
> netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
>
> - if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_NETSYS_V2))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (mtk_uses_dsa(dev) && !eth->prog) {
> + if (!MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_NETSYS_V2) &&
> + mtk_uses_dsa(dev) && !eth->prog) {
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->dsa_meta); i++) {
> struct metadata_dst *md_dst = eth->dsa_meta[i];
>
> @@ -3244,10 +3242,6 @@ static int mtk_open(struct net_device *dev)
> val &= ~MTK_CDMP_STAG_EN;
> mtk_w32(eth, val, MTK_CDMP_IG_CTRL);
>
> - val = mtk_r32(eth, MTK_CDMQ_IG_CTRL);
> - val &= ~MTK_CDMQ_STAG_EN;
> - mtk_w32(eth, val, MTK_CDMQ_IG_CTRL);
> -
> mtk_w32(eth, 0, MTK_CDMP_EG_CTRL);
> }
>
>
>
seems not helping...this is how i test it:
ip link set eth1 up
ip link add link eth1 name vlan500 type vlan id 500
ip link add link wan name vlan600 type vlan id 600
ip addr add 192.168.50.1/24 dev vlan500
ip addr add 192.168.60.1/24 dev vlan600
ip link set vlan500 up
ip link set wan up
ip link set vlan600 up
#do this on the other side:
#netif=enp3s0
#sudo ip link add link $netif name vlan500 type vlan id 500
#sudo ip link add link $netif name vlan600 type vlan id 600
#sudo ip link set vlan500 up
#sudo ip link set vlan600 up
#sudo ip addr add 192.168.50.2/24 dev vlan500
#sudo ip addr add 192.168.60.2/24 dev vlan600
verified all used ports on my switch are in trunk-mode with vlan-membership of these 2 vlan.
booted 6.1 and there is vlan on dsa-port broken too, so either my test-setup is broken or code...but wonder why 6.1 is broken too...
with tcp-dump on my laptop i see that some packets came in for both vlan, but they seem not valid, arp only for vlan 500 (eth1 on r3).
$ sudo tcpdump -i enp3s0 -nn -e vlan
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
listening on enp3s0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
14:49:09.548909 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > 33:33:00:00:83:84, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 524: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), fe80::e6b9:7aff:fef7:c48b.34177 > ff12::8384.21027: UDP, length 458
14:49:09.548929 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > 33:33:00:00:83:84, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 524: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), fe80::e6b9:7aff:fef7:c48b.34177 > ff12::8384.21027: UDP, length 458
14:49:09.549470 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 504: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), 192.168.50.2.33050 > 192.168.50.255.21027: UDP, length 458
14:49:09.549522 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 504: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), 192.168.60.2.33050 > 192.168.60.255.21027: UDP, length 458
14:49:26.324503 92:65:f3:ec:b0:19 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 60: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806), Request who-has 192.168.50.2 tell 192.168.50.1, length 42
14:49:26.324525 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > 92:65:f3:ec:b0:19, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806), Reply 192.168.50.2 is-at e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b, length 28
14:49:26.325091 92:65:f3:ec:b0:19 > e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 102: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), 192.168.50.1 > 192.168.50.2: ICMP echo request, id 44246, seq 1, length 64
14:49:26.325158 e4:b9:7a:f7:c4:8b > 92:65:f3:ec:b0:19, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 102: vlan 500, p 0, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), 192.168.50.2 > 192.168.50.1: ICMP echo reply, id 44246, seq 1, length 64
on r3 i see these packets going out (so far it looks good):
root@...-r3:~# ping 192.168.60.2
PING 192.168.60.2 (192.168.60.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
13:30:29.782003 08:22:33:44:55:77 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806),
Request who-has 192.168.60.2 tell 192.168.60.1, length 28
13:30:30.788175 08:22:33:44:55:77 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806),
Request who-has 192.168.60.2 tell 192.168.60.1, length 28
13:30:31.828181 08:22:33:44:55:77 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806),
Request who-has 192.168.60.2 tell 192.168.60.1, length 28
From 192.168.60.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
13:30:32.868205 08:22:33:44:55:77 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806),
Request who-has 192.168.60.2 tell 192.168.60.1, length 28
13:30:33.908171 08:22:33:44:55:77 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 46: vlan 600, p 0, ethertype ARP (0x0806),
Request who-has 192.168.60.2 tell 192.168.60.1, length 28
HTH, maybe daniel or anyone other can confirm this
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists