netdev - [PATCH net 4/7] netfilter: nf_tables: perform type checking for existing sets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230102164025.125995-5-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Mon,  2 Jan 2023 17:40:22 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH net 4/7] netfilter: nf_tables: perform type checking for existing sets

If a ruleset declares a set name that matches an existing set in the
kernel, then validate that this declaration really refers to the same
set, otherwise bail out with EEXIST.

Currently, the kernel reports success when adding a set that already
exists in the kernel. This usually results in EINVAL errors at a later
stage, when the user adds elements to the set, if the set declaration
mismatches the existing set representation in the kernel.

Add a new function to check that the set declaration really refers to
the same existing set in the kernel.

Fixes: 96518518cc41 ("netfilter: add nftables")
Reported-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index b9b0ae29f5f6..319887f4d3ef 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -4441,6 +4441,34 @@ static int nft_set_expr_alloc(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static bool nft_set_is_same(const struct nft_set *set,
+			    const struct nft_set_desc *desc,
+			    struct nft_expr *exprs[], u32 num_exprs, u32 flags)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (set->ktype != desc->ktype ||
+	    set->dtype != desc->dtype ||
+	    set->flags != flags ||
+	    set->klen != desc->klen ||
+	    set->dlen != desc->dlen ||
+	    set->field_count != desc->field_count ||
+	    set->num_exprs != num_exprs)
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < desc->field_count; i++) {
+		if (set->field_len[i] != desc->field_len[i])
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_exprs; i++) {
+		if (set->exprs[i]->ops != exprs[i]->ops)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int nf_tables_newset(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 			    const struct nlattr * const nla[])
 {
@@ -4595,10 +4623,16 @@ static int nf_tables_newset(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 
+		err = 0;
+		if (!nft_set_is_same(set, &desc, exprs, num_exprs, flags)) {
+			NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_SET_NAME]);
+			err = -EEXIST;
+		}
+
 		for (i = 0; i < num_exprs; i++)
 			nft_expr_destroy(&ctx, exprs[i]);
 
-		return 0;
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	if (!(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE))
-- 
2.30.2