[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7Vl8CHL935On/7o@unreal>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:41:36 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: pkshih@...ltek.com, kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: Add missing check for alloc_workqueue
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:33:53PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of alloc_workqueue since it may return
> NULL pointer.
>
> Fixes: e3ec7017f6a2 ("rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> index 931aff8b5dc9..006fe0499f81 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
> @@ -3124,6 +3124,8 @@ int rtw89_core_init(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rtwdev->cfo_track_work, rtw89_phy_cfo_track_work);
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rtwdev->forbid_ba_work, rtw89_forbid_ba_work);
> rtwdev->txq_wq = alloc_workqueue("rtw89_tx_wq", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
> + if (!rtwdev->txq_wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
While the change is fixing one issue, you are adding another one.
There is no destroy of this workqueue if rtw89_load_firmware fails.
Thanks
> spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->ba_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->rpwm_lock);
> mutex_init(&rtwdev->mutex);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists