netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 10/10] netdevsim: register devlink instance before sub-objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230103185216.378279d7@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 18:52:16 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     jacob.e.keller@...el.com, leon@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 10/10] netdevsim: register devlink instance
 before sub-objects

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:51:14 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> I wonder, why don't you squash patch 8 to this one and make 1 move, to
> >> the fina destination?  
> >
> >I found the squashed version a lot harder to review.  
> 
> I'm puzzled. Both patches move calls to devl_register/unregister().
> The first one moves it, the second one moves it a bit more. What's
> making the squashed patch hard to review?

Ah, I thought you meant patch 7, sorry.
This one matters less, I'll squash.