[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7U8aAhdE3TuhtxH@lore-desk>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 09:44:24 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>, gal@...dia.com,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, tariqt@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] samples/bpf: fixup some tools to be able to
support xdp multibuffer
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 16:19:49 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Hmm, good question! I don't think we've ever explicitly documented any
> > assumptions one way or the other. My own mental model has certainly
> > always assumed the first frag would continue to be the same size as in
> > non-multi-buf packets.
>
> Interesting! :) My mental model was closer to GRO by frags
> so the linear part would have no data, just headers.
That is assumption as well.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> A random datapoint is that bpf_xdp_adjust_head() seems
> to enforce that there is at least ETH_HLEN.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists