netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information about max frame size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:37:12 +0100
From:   Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information
 about max frame size

Hi Andrew, Alexander,

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> > > @@ -3548,7 +3548,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_get_max_mtu(struct
> > > dsa_switch *ds, int port) if
> > > (chip->info->ops->port_set_jumbo_size) return 10240 -
> > > VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN; else if
> > > (chip->info->ops->set_max_frame_size)
> > > -		return 1632 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN -
> > > ETH_FCS_LEN;
> > > +		return (max_t(int, chip->info->max_frame_size,
> > > 1632)
> > > +			- VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN -
> > > ETH_FCS_LEN); +
> > >  	return 1522 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
> > >  
> > 
> > I would also prefer if all this if/else logic is removed, and the
> > code simply returned chip->info->max_frame_size - VLAN_ETH_HLEN -
> > EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
> >   
> 
> So then the mv88e6xxx_get_max_mtu shall look like:
> 
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!chip->info->max_frame_size)
> 
> if (chip->info->ops->port_set_jumbo_size)
> ...
> else 
>     return chip->info->max_frame_size - VLAN_ETH_HLEN -
> 	EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
> 
> 
> Or shall I put WARN_ON_ONCE to the mv88e6xxx_probe() function?
> 
> 
> The above approach is contrary to one proposed by Alexander, who
> wanted to improve the defensive approach in this driver (to avoid
> situation where the max_frame_size callback is not defined and
> max_frame_size member of *_info struct is not added by developer).
> 
> Which approach is the recommended one for this driver?

Is there any decision regarding the preferred approach to rewrite this
code?

> 
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h
> > > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ struct mv88e6xxx_info {
> > >  	unsigned int num_gpio;
> > >  	unsigned int max_vid;
> > >  	unsigned int max_sid;
> > > +	unsigned int max_frame_size;    
> > 
> > It might be worth adding a comment here what this value actually
> > represents.  
> 
> Ok. I will add proper comment.
> 
> > We don't want any mixups where the value already has the
> > frame checksum removed for example.  
> 
> Could you be more specific here about this use case?
> 
> The max_frame_size is the maximal size of the ethernet frame for which
> the IC designer provided specified amount of RAM (it is a different
> value for different SoCs in the Link Street family).
> 
> > 
> >       Andrew  
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lukasz Majewski
> 
> --
> 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
> lukma@...x.de




Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@...x.de

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped