netdev - Re: [Patch net-next v7 06/13] net: ptp: add helper for one-step P2P clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:48:55 +0000
From:   <Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC:     <olteanv@...il.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <ceggers@...i.de>,
        <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <richardcochran@...il.com>, <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v7 06/13] net: ptp: add helper for one-step P2P
 clocks

Hi Paolo,
Thanks for the review comment.
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 11:49 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> 
> > > +/**
> > > + * ptp_header_update_correction - Update PTP header's correction
> > > field
> > > + * @skb: packet buffer
> > > + * @type: type of the packet (see ptp_classify_raw())
> > > + * @hdr: ptp header
> > > + * @correction: new correction value
> > > + *
> > > + * This updates the correction field of a PTP header and updates
> > > the UDP
> > > + * checksum (if UDP is used as transport). It is needed for
> > > hardware capable of
> > > + * one-step P2P that does not already modify the correction
> > > field of Pdelay_Req
> > > + * event messages on ingress.
> > > + */
> > > +static inline
> > > +void ptp_header_update_correction(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned
> > > int type,
> > > +                             struct ptp_header *hdr, s64
> > > correction)
> > > +{
> > > +   __be64 correction_old;
> > > +   struct udphdr *uhdr;
> > > +
> > > +   /* previous correction value is required for checksum update.
> > > */
> > > +   memcpy(&correction_old,  &hdr->correction,
> > > sizeof(correction_old));
> > > +
> > > +   /* write new correction value */
> > > +   put_unaligned_be64((u64)correction, &hdr->correction);
> > > +
> > > +   switch (type & PTP_CLASS_PMASK) {
> > > +   case PTP_CLASS_IPV4:
> > > +   case PTP_CLASS_IPV6:
> > > +           /* locate udp header */
> > > +           uhdr = (struct udphdr *)((char *)hdr - sizeof(struct
> > > udphdr));
> > > +           break;
> > > +   default:
> > > +           return;
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > > +   /* update checksum */
> > > +   uhdr->check = csum_fold(ptp_check_diff8(correction_old,
> > > +                                           hdr->correction,
> > > +                                           ~csum_unfold(uhdr-
> > > >check)));
> > > +   if (!uhdr->check)
> > > +           uhdr->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
> > 
> > AFAICS the above works under the assumption that skb->ip_summed !=
> > CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, and such assumption is true for the existing DSA
> > devices.
> > 
> > Still the new helper is a generic one, so perhaps it should take
> > care
> > of CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, too? Or at least add a big fat warning in the
> > helper documentation and/or a warn_on_once(CHECKSUM_COMPLETE).
> 
> I see this helper is used later even in the tx path, so even packet
> with ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL could reach here and should be
> accomodated accordingly.

Do I need to update the checksum only if ip_sum is not equal to
CHECKSUM_COMPLETE or CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.

if ( skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE ||
     skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
	warn_on_once(1);
	return;
}

Kindly suggest.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo
> 
>