[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb0f6eff-1456-1b59-b598-bff79cd749e1@seco.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:25:31 -0500
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/4] phy: aquantia: Determine rate adaptation
support from registers
On 1/5/23 08:39, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 05:05:07PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> This attempts to address the problems first reported in [1]. Tim has an
>> Aquantia phy where the firmware is set up to use "5G XFI" (underclocked
>> 10GBASE-R) when rate adapting lower speeds. This results in us
>> advertising that we support lower speeds and then failing to bring the
>> link up. To avoid this, determine whether to enable rate adaptation
>> based on what's programmed by the firmware. This is "the worst choice"
>> [2], but we can't really do better until we have more insight into
>> what the firmware is doing. At the very least, we can prevent bad
>> firmware from causing us to advertise the wrong modes.
>
> After this patch set, is there any reason why phydev->rate_matching
> still exists and must be populated by the PHY driver?
It's necessary for phylink_link_up to know what speed to use for the MAC.
--Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists