netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev events fixes in RDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230105103746.13c791d8@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:37:46 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev
 events fixes in RDMA

On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:05:54 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > This series includes mlx5 modifications for both net-next and
> > rdma-next trees.
> > 
> > In case of no objections, this series will be applied to net-mlx5 branch
> > first then sent in PR to both rdma and net trees.  
> 
> PR should be based on Linus's -rcX tag and shouldn't include only this patchset.

FWIW I don't understand what you mean by this comment.
PR should be based on a common ancestor, the -rc tags 
are just a convenient shorthand.