netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev events fixes in RDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y7cvLGQwaWKrFixC@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:12:28 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev
 events fixes in RDMA

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 10:37:46AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:05:54 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > This series includes mlx5 modifications for both net-next and
> > > rdma-next trees.
> > > 
> > > In case of no objections, this series will be applied to net-mlx5 branch
> > > first then sent in PR to both rdma and net trees.  
> > 
> > PR should be based on Linus's -rcX tag and shouldn't include only this patchset.
> 
> FWIW I don't understand what you mean by this comment.
> PR should be based on a common ancestor, the -rc tags 
> are just a convenient shorthand.

Linus asked for more than once to use sensible ancestor which is -rc.

Thanks