[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b61f312-2377-53c2-ff66-cc4f71c124d3@engleder-embedded.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 23:28:40 +0100
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] tsnep: Add RX queue info for XDP support
On 05.01.23 18:35, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
> Date: Wed Jan 04 2023 20:41:31 GMT+0100
>
>> Register xdp_rxq_info with page_pool memory model. This is needed for
>> XDP buffer handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h | 6 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
>> index 0e7fc36a64e1..0210dab90f71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
>> @@ -133,17 +133,19 @@ struct tsnep_rx {
>> u32 dropped;
>> u32 multicast;
>> u32 alloc_failed;
>> +
>> + struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
>> };
>>
>> struct tsnep_queue {
>> struct tsnep_adapter *adapter;
>> char name[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>>
>> + struct napi_struct napi;
>> +
>> struct tsnep_tx *tx;
>> struct tsnep_rx *rx;
>>
>> - struct napi_struct napi;
>> -
>
> I'd leave a word in the commit message that you're moving ::napi to
> improve structure cacheline span. Or even do that in a separate commit
> with some pahole output to make it clear why you do that.
I only reordered based on access order during initialization. But I
understand that this not a valid reason. I will remove that reordering.
>> int irq;
>> u32 irq_mask;
>> void __iomem *irq_delay_addr;
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1253,6 +1266,7 @@ int tsnep_netdev_open(struct net_device *netdev)
>> {
>> struct tsnep_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> int i;
>> + unsigned int napi_id;
>
> Reverse Christmas Tree variable style is already messed up here, maybe
> you could fix it inplace while at it or at least not make it worse? :D
I forgot to do that here. Will be fixed.
Gerhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists