netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/15] devlink: split out core code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1404e736-35b0-9960-e6ac-6b3d290b29f7@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:13:42 -0800
From:   Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 03/15] devlink: split out core code



On 1/5/2023 10:34 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:16:40 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Btw, I don't think it is correct to carry Jacob's review tag around when
>> the patches changed (not only this one).
> 
> There's no clear rule for that :(  I see more people screaming 
> at submitters for dropping tags than for keeping them so I err 
> on that side myself.
> 
> Here I think the case is relatively clear, since I'm only doing
> renames and bike-shedding stuff, and Jake is not one to bike-shed 
> in my experience.

Now that I'm back from vacation, I can just clarify here:

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>