[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47fedda8-a13c-b62f-251f-b62508964bb0@digikod.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 20:22:35 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, artem.kuzin@...wei.com,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/12] landlock: Add network rules support
On 04/01/2023 12:41, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
>
>
> 11/17/2022 9:43 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
[...]
>>> /**
>>> @@ -79,6 +91,24 @@ struct landlock_path_beneath_attr {
>>> */
>>> } __attribute__((packed));
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct landlock_net_service_attr - TCP subnet definition
>>> + *
>>> + * Argument of sys_landlock_add_rule().
>>> + */
>>> +struct landlock_net_service_attr {
>>> + /**
>>> + * @allowed_access: Bitmask of allowed access network for services
>>> + * (cf. `Network flags`_).
>>> + */
>>> + __u64 allowed_access;
>>> + /**
>>> + * @port: Network port.
>>> + */
>>> + __u16 port;
>>
>> From an UAPI point of view, I think the port field should be __be16, as
>> for sockaddr_in->port and other network-related APIs. This will require
>> some kernel changes to please sparse: make C=2 security/landlock/ must
>> not print any warning.
>
> I have this errors trying to launch sparse checking:
>
> DESCEND objtool
> DESCEND bpf/resolve_btfids
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CHK kernel/kheaders_data.tar.xz
> CC security/landlock/setup.o
> CHECK security/landlock/setup.c
> ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:16: error: typename in expression
> ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:16: error: Expected ) in function call
> ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:16: error: got :
> ./include/linux/list.h:292:16: error: typename in expression
> ./include/linux/list.h:292:16: error: Expected ) in function call
> ./include/linux/list.h:292:16: error: got :
>
> ....
>
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:682:16: error: Expected ) in function call
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:682:16: error: got :
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:695:16: error: typename in expression
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:695:16: error: Expected ) in function call
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:695:16: error: too many errors
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: security/landlock/setup.o]
> Error 139
> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'security/landlock/setup.o'
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: security/landlock/syscalls.o]
> Error 139
> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'security/landlock/syscalls.o'
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:502: security/landlock] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:502: security] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [Makefile:1994: .] Error 2
I don't know about this error. Did you follow the documentation?
https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/sparse.html#getting-sparse
>>
>> Using big-endian values as keys (casted to uintptr_t, not strictly
>> __be16) in the rb-tree should not be an issue because there is no port
>> range ordering (for now).
>>
>> A dedicated test should check that endianness is correct, e.g. by using
>> different port encoding. This should include passing and failing tests,
>> but they should work on all architectures (i.e. big or little endian).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists