netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev events fixes in RDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230106131723.2c7596e3@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:17:23 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev
 events fixes in RDMA

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:35:38 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 05 Jan 10:38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >On Wed,  4 Jan 2023 20:17:48 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:  
> >>   net/mlx5: Configure IPsec steering for ingress RoCEv2 traffic
> >>   net/mlx5: Configure IPsec steering for egress RoCEv2 traffic  
> >
> >How is the TC forwarding coming along?  
> 
> Not aware of such effort, can you please elaborate ? 

When Leon posted the IPsec patches I correctly guessed that it's for
RDMA and expressed my strong preference for RDMA to stop using netdev
interfaces for configuration. He made the claim that the full IPsec
offload will be used for eswitch offload as well, so I'm asking how 
is that work going.