netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add reset/reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2023 21:48:32 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org,
        sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
        sujuan.chen@...iatek.com, daniel@...rotopia.org, kvalo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add
 reset/reset_complete callbacks

On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:49:49 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > These callbacks are implemented in the mt76 driver. I have not added these
> > > patches to the series since mt76 patches usually go through Felix/Kalle's
> > > trees (anyway I am fine to add them to the series if they can go into net-next
> > > directly).  
> > 
> > Usually patches that use specific functionality are submitted together
> > with API changes.  
> 
> I would say it is better mt76 patches go through Felix/Kalle's tree in order to avoid
> conflicts.
> 
> @Felix, Kalle: any opinions?

FWIW as long as the implementation is in net-next before the merge
window I'm fine either way. But it would be good to see the
implementation, a co-posted RFC maybe?