[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2795feb1-c968-b588-6a4c-9716afd8ecf2@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 16:41:01 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/17] bpf: Introduce device-bound XDP
programs
On 1/4/23 1:59 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> @@ -199,12 +197,12 @@ int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
> attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (attr->prog_flags)
> + if (attr->prog_flags & ~BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
The kzalloc is still needed. Although a latter patch added it bad, it is better
not to miss it in the first place.
> - if (!offload)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (attr->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS &&
> + attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> offload->prog = prog;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists