[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50dfdff7-81c7-ab40-a6c5-e5e73959b780@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 18:04:54 -0800
From: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] Remove three Sun net drivers
On 1/6/2023 5:36 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 1/6/23 23:00, Anirudh Venkataramanan wrote:
>> This series removes the Sun Cassini, LDOM vswitch and sunvnet drivers.
>
> This would affect a large number of Linux on SPARC users. Please don't!
Thanks for chiming in. Does your statement above apply to all 3 drivers?
>
> We're still maintaining an active sparc64 port for Debian, see [1]. So
> does Gentoo [2].
>
>> In a recent patch series that touched these drivers [1], it was suggested
>> that these drivers should be removed completely. git logs suggest that
>> there hasn't been any significant feature addition, improvement or fixes
>> to user-visible bugs in a while. A web search didn't indicate any recent
>> discussions or any evidence that there are users out there who care about
>> these drivers.
>
> Well, these drivers just work and I don't see why there should be regular
> discussions about them or changes.
That's fair, but lack of discussion can also be signs of disuse, and
that's really the hunch I was following up on. Given what you and Karl
have said, I agree that we shouldn't remove these drivers. I'll stop
pursuing this unless there are new arguments to the contrary.
Ani
Powered by blists - more mailing lists