[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7mEItAb41ANfDS+@lore-desk>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:39:30 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, sujuan.chen@...iatek.com,
daniel@...rotopia.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/5] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: add
reset/reset_complete callbacks
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:59:17PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:03:14PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > Introduce reset and reset_complete wlan callback to schedule WLAN driver
> > > > reset when ethernet/wed driver is resetting.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Sujuan Chen <sujuan.chen@...iatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sujuan Chen <sujuan.chen@...iatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 6 ++++
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_wed.h | 8 +++++
> > > > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h | 2 ++
> > > > 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > > index bafae4f0312e..2d74e26f45c9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > > @@ -3913,6 +3913,10 @@ static void mtk_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > mtk_w32(eth, val, MTK_MAC_MCR(i));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + rtnl_unlock();
> > > > + mtk_wed_fe_reset();
> > > > + rtnl_lock();
> > >
> > > Is it safe to call rtnl_unlock(), perform some work and lock again?
> >
> > Yes, mtk_pending_work sets MTK_RESETTING bit and a new reset work is not
> > scheduled until this bit is cleared
>
> I'm more worried about opening a window for user-space access while you
> are performing FW reset.
looking at mtk_pending_work() I guess running mtk_wed_fe_reset() releasing RTNL
lock is not harmful since we just perform few actions (ppe reset, ...) before
running mtk_wed_fe_reset(). Moreover, the core reset part in mtk_pending_work()
(mtk_stop(), mtk_open(), ..) is done after mtk_wed_fe_reset() where we reacquired
RTNL lock.
In order to avoid any possible race, I guess we can just re-do the preliminary
reset configuration done before mtk_wed_fe_reset() just after re-acquiring RTNL
lock.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> <...>
>
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
> > > > index db637a13888d..ddff54fc9717 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk_wed.h
> > > > @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ struct mtk_wed_device {
> > > > void (*release_rx_buf)(struct mtk_wed_device *wed);
> > > > void (*update_wo_rx_stats)(struct mtk_wed_device *wed,
> > > > struct mtk_wed_wo_rx_stats *stats);
> > > > + int (*reset)(struct mtk_wed_device *wed);
> > > > + int (*reset_complete)(struct mtk_wed_device *wed);
> > >
> > > I don't see any driver implementation of these callbacks in this series.
> > > Did I miss it?
> >
> > These callbacks are implemented in the mt76 driver. I have not added these
> > patches to the series since mt76 patches usually go through Felix/Kalle's
> > trees (anyway I am fine to add them to the series if they can go into net-next
> > directly).
>
> Usually patches that use specific functionality are submitted together
> with API changes.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > > } wlan;
> > > > #endif
> > > > };
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.0
> > > >
>
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists