lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y707Pa+U7LiJBER/@Laptop-X1> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:17:33 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] sched: multicast sched extack messages On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:43:06AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:56:00 -0500 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > IMO the feature is useful. The idea of using a single tool to get the > > details improves the operational experience. > > And in this case this is a valid event (someone tried to add an entry to > > hardware and s/ware and it worked for > > one and not the other). > > I think Jakub's objection is in the approach. > > Right. > > > Jakub, would using specific attributes restricted to > > just QDISC/FILTER/ACTION work for you? > > Yes, specific attr to wrap the extack seems acceptable. Looks we go back to the TCA_NTF_WARN_MSG approach[1], right? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y3OJucOnuGrBvwYM@Laptop-X1/ Thanks Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists