[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mt6qfvb1.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:06:26 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony0620emma\@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
"tehuang\@realtek.com" <tehuang@...ltek.com>,
"s.hauer\@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rtw88: Four fixes found while working on SDIO support
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> writes:
> Hi Ping-Ke,
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:26 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> > Martin Blumenstingl (4):
>> > rtw88: Add packed attribute to the eFuse structs
>>
>> I think this patch depends on another patchset or oppositely.
>> Please point that out for reviewers.
>
> There are no dependencies for this smaller individual series other
> than Linux 6.2-rc1 (as this has USB support). I made sure to not
> include any of the SDIO changes in this series.
> The idea is that it can be applied individually and make it either
> into 6.2-rc2 (or newer) or -next (6.3).
BTW wireless-next or wireless-testing are the preferred baselines for
wireless patches. Of course you can use other trees if you really want,
but please try to make sure they apply to wireless-next. Conflicts are
always extra churn I would prefer to avoid.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists