lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230110061123.338427-2-saeed@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:11:08 -0800 From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org> To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> Subject: [net 01/16] net/mlx5: DR, Fix 'stack frame size exceeds limit' error in dr_rule From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com> If the kernel configuration asks the compiler to check frame limit of 1K, dr_rule_create_rule_nic exceed this limit: "stack frame size (1184) exceeds limit (1024)" Fixing this issue by checking configured frame limit and using the optimization STE array only for cases with the usual 2K (or larger) stack size warning. Fixes: b9b81e1e9382 ("net/mlx5: DR, For short chains of STEs, avoid allocating ste_arr dynamically") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com> --- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c index 74cbe53ee9db..b851141e03de 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_rule.c @@ -3,7 +3,12 @@ #include "dr_types.h" +#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_WARN) && (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN < 2048) +/* don't try to optimize STE allocation if the stack is too constaraining */ +#define DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED 0 +#else #define DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED 5 +#endif #define DR_RULE_MAX_STE_CHAIN_OPTIMIZED (DR_RULE_MAX_STES_OPTIMIZED + DR_ACTION_MAX_STES) static int dr_rule_append_to_miss_list(struct mlx5dr_domain *dmn, @@ -1218,10 +1223,7 @@ dr_rule_create_rule_nic(struct mlx5dr_rule *rule, mlx5dr_domain_nic_unlock(nic_dmn); - if (unlikely(!hw_ste_arr_is_opt)) - kfree(hw_ste_arr); - - return 0; + goto out; free_rule: dr_rule_clean_rule_members(rule, nic_rule); @@ -1238,6 +1240,7 @@ dr_rule_create_rule_nic(struct mlx5dr_rule *rule, free_hw_ste: mlx5dr_domain_nic_unlock(nic_dmn); +out: if (unlikely(!hw_ste_arr_is_opt)) kfree(hw_ste_arr); -- 2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists