netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] rndis_wlan: Prevent buffer overflow in rndis_query

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8471471-3b9f-526c-b8d0-88bd3de6d409@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:12:44 +0100
From:   Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@...il.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     kvalo@...nel.org, jussi.kivilinna@....fi, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        greg@...ah.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rndis_wlan: Prevent buffer overflow in rndis_query_oid

On 11/01/2023 19:28, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 9:51 AM Szymon Heidrich
> <szymon.heidrich@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since resplen and respoffs are signed integers sufficiently
>> large values of unsigned int len and offset members of RNDIS
>> response will result in negative values of prior variables.
>> This may be utilized to bypass implemented security checks
>> to either extract memory contents by manipulating offset or
>> overflow the data buffer via memcpy by manipulating both
>> offset and len.
>>
>> Additionally assure that sum of resplen and respoffs does not
>> overflow so buffer boundaries are kept.
>>
>> Fixes: 80f8c5b434f9 ("rndis_wlan: copy only useful data from rndis_command respond")
>> Signed-off-by: Szymon Heidrich <szymon.heidrich@...il.com>
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2: Use size_t and min macro, fix netdev_dbg format
>>
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c | 19 ++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c
>> index 82a7458e0..bf72e5fd3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c
>> @@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ static int rndis_query_oid(struct usbnet *dev, u32 oid, void *data, int *len)
>>                 struct rndis_query      *get;
>>                 struct rndis_query_c    *get_c;
>>         } u;
>> -       int ret, buflen;
>> -       int resplen, respoffs, copylen;
>> +       int ret;
>> +       size_t buflen, resplen, respoffs, copylen;
>>
>>         buflen = *len + sizeof(*u.get);
>>         if (buflen < CONTROL_BUFFER_SIZE)
>> @@ -732,22 +732,15 @@ static int rndis_query_oid(struct usbnet *dev, u32 oid, void *data, int *len)
>>
>>                 if (respoffs > buflen) {
>>                         /* Device returned data offset outside buffer, error. */
>> -                       netdev_dbg(dev->net, "%s(%s): received invalid "
>> -                               "data offset: %d > %d\n", __func__,
>> -                               oid_to_string(oid), respoffs, buflen);
>> +                       netdev_dbg(dev->net,
>> +                                  "%s(%s): received invalid data offset: %zu > %zu\n",
>> +                                  __func__, oid_to_string(oid), respoffs, buflen);
>>
>>                         ret = -EINVAL;
>>                         goto exit_unlock;
>>                 }
>>
>> -               if ((resplen + respoffs) > buflen) {
>> -                       /* Device would have returned more data if buffer would
>> -                        * have been big enough. Copy just the bits that we got.
>> -                        */
>> -                       copylen = buflen - respoffs;
>> -               } else {
>> -                       copylen = resplen;
>> -               }
>> +               copylen = min(resplen, buflen - respoffs);
>>
>>                 if (copylen > *len)
>>                         copylen = *len;
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>

Awesome, thank you very much.