[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tu0wcb3l.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:15:42 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>
Cc: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@...cinc.com>,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: snoc: enable threaded napi on WCN3990
Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org> writes:
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > @@ -927,6 +927,9 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_hif_start(struct ath10k *ar)
>> >
>> > bitmap_clear(ar_snoc->pending_ce_irqs, 0, CE_COUNT_MAX);
>> >
>> > + if (ar->hw_params.enable_threaded_napi)
>> > + dev_set_threaded(&ar->napi_dev, true);
>> > +
>>
>> Since this is done in the API specific to WCN3990, we do not need
>> hw_param for this.
>
> Just so that I am clear, are you suggesting to enable this by default
> in snoc.c, similar to what you did in
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220905071805.31625-2-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com/
>
> If my understanding is correct and there is no objection, I can remove
> hw_param and enable it by default on snoc.c . I used hw_param because,
> as I see it, threaded NAPI can have some adverse effect on the cache
> utilization and power.
WCN3990 is the only device using SNOC bus so the hw_param is not needed.
It's safe to call dev_set_threaded() in ath10k_snoc_hif_start()
unconditionally as it only affects WCN3990.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists