netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for mv88e6390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8AGFJlQBEhTqQs7@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:07:32 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for
 mv88e6390

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:12:24AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> The switch receives management traffic such as STP and LLDP. However, PTP
> messages are not received, only transmitted.
> 
> Ideally, the switch would trap all PTP messages to the management CPU. This
> particular switch has a PTP block which identifies PTP messages and traps them
> to a dedicated port. There is a register to program this destination. This is
> not used at the moment.
> 
> Therefore, program it to the same port as the MGMT traffic is trapped to. This
> allows to receive PTP messages as soon as timestamping is enabled.
> 
> In addition, the datasheet mentions that this register is not valid e.g., for
> 6190 variants. So, add a new PTP operation which is only added for the both 6390
> devices.

I assume this also works for the 6290? Please could you also update
its _ops structure?

Otherwise this looks good.

	  Andrew