[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230113111401.hyq7xogfo5tx77e7@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:14:01 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information
about max frame size
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:39:08AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Are there any more comments, or is this patch set eligible for
> > > pulling into net-next tree?
> >
> > How about responding to the comment that was already posted first?
>
> Could you be more specific?
>
>
> On the beginning (first posted version) the patch included 9 patches
> (which included work for ADDR4 for some mv88e6020 setup).
>
> But after the discussion, I've decided to split this patch set to
> smaller pieces;
>
> First to add the set_max_frame size with basic definition for mv88e6020
> and mv88e6071 and then follow with more complicated changes (for which
> there is no agreement on how to tackle them).
>
> For the 'set_max_frame' feature Alexander Dyuck had some comments
> regarding defensive programming approach, but finally he agreed with
> Andrew's approach.
>
> As of now - the v4 has been Acked by Andrew, so it looks like at least
> this "part" of the work is eligible for upstreaming.
>
>
> Or there are any more issues about which I've forgotten ?
Do you agree that for the chip families which neither implement
port_set_jumbo_size() nor set_max_frame_size(), a max MTU of 1492 will
be returned, which currently produces warnings at probe time and should
be fixed first, prior to refactoring the code?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230106101651.1137755-1-lukma@denx.de/#25149891
Powered by blists - more mailing lists