[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230113113959.75b0fe38@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:40:08 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
syzbot+4bb6356bb29d6299360e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix wrong error return in
rxrpc_connect_call()
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:07:15 +0000 David Howells wrote:
> Fix rxrpc_connect_call() to return -ENOMEM rather than 0 if it fails to
> look up a peer.
>
> This generated a smatch warning:
> net/rxrpc/call_object.c:303 rxrpc_connect_call() warn: missing error code 'ret'
>
> I think this also fixes a syzbot-found bug:
>
> rxrpc: Assertion failed - 1(0x1) == 11(0xb) is false
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/call_object.c:645!
>
> where the call being put is in the wrong state - as would be the case if we
> failed to clear up correctly after the error in rxrpc_connect_call().
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists