netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] amd-xgbe: PFC and KR-Training fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:02:20 +0530
From:   Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] amd-xgbe: PFC and KR-Training fixes



On 1/13/2023 4:06 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:19:34 +0530 Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>> I have put an Ack tag to the patches in the series, being the additional
>> maintainer for this driver. As Tom is busy working on other areas, I
>> shall be a single maintainer for this driver going forward.
>>
>> I can submit a patch for the change to the MAINTAINERS file.
> 
> For Fixes of code that someone authored it'd be better if the person 
> is CCed, as long as their email address still works. For net-next
> material, if you're posting as a co-maintainer not CCing other
> maintainers is no big deal.

Noted.

> 
>> But would you mind pulling this series for now? Or would you like to see
>> the MAINTAINERS file getting updated first?
> 
> Yes, no need to repost this one. Just something to keep in mind for 
> the future.
> 

Thanks! Will take care of thie is future.

Thanks,
Shyam