[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8D/dXTBxrLOwmgc@unreal>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:51:33 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Hao Lan <lanhao@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, yisen.zhuang@...wei.com,
salil.mehta@...wei.com, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, shenjian15@...wei.com,
wangjie125@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: hns3: add vf fault process in hns3 ras
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:08:29AM +0800, Hao Lan wrote:
> From: Jie Wang <wangjie125@...wei.com>
>
> Currently hns3 driver supports vf fault detect feature. Several ras caused
> by VF resources don't need to do PF function reset for recovery. The driver
> only needs to reset the specified VF.
>
> So this patch adds process in ras module. New process will get detailed
> information about ras and do the most correct measures based on these
> accurate information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <wangjie125@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Lan <lanhao@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hnae3.h | 1 +
> .../hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.h | 1 +
> .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_err.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_err.h | 2 +
> .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c | 3 +-
> .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Why is it good idea to reset VF from PF?
What will happen with driver bound to this VF?
Shouldn't PCI recovery handle it?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists