[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRXd+RkHSRLUt=0HFm42xPKGsSdSkxA6EHwipDukZH_mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:38:59 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] cipso_ipv4: use iph_set_totlen in skbuff_setattr
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:31 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It may process IPv4 TCP GSO packets in cipso_v4_skbuff_setattr(), so
> the iph->tot_len update should use iph_set_totlen().
>
> Note that for these non GSO packets, the new iph tot_len with extra
> iph option len added may become greater than 65535, the old process
> will cast it and set iph->tot_len to it, which is a bug. In theory,
> iph options shouldn't be added for these big packets in here, a fix
> may be needed here in the future. For now this patch is only to set
> iph->tot_len to 0 when it happens.
I'm not entirely clear on the paragraph above, but we do need to be
able to set/modify the IP options in cipso_v4_skbuff_setattr() in
order to support CIPSO labeling. I'm open to better and/or
alternative solutions compared to what we are doing now, but I can't
support a change that is a bug waiting to bite us. My apologies if
I'm interpreting your comments incorrectly and that isn't the case
here.
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> index 6cd3b6c559f0..79ae7204e8ed 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
> @@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ int cipso_v4_skbuff_setattr(struct sk_buff *skb,
> memset((char *)(iph + 1) + buf_len, 0, opt_len - buf_len);
> if (len_delta != 0) {
> iph->ihl = 5 + (opt_len >> 2);
> - iph->tot_len = htons(skb->len);
> + iph_set_totlen(iph, skb->len);
> }
> ip_send_check(iph);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists