netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v6 2/6] dsa: lan9303: move Turbo Mode bit init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1693C77544D2AF002A58DD68EFC19@MWHPR11MB1693.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 18:06:30 +0000
From:   <Jerry.Ray@...rochip.com>
To:     <olteanv@...il.com>
CC:     <andrew@...n.ch>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <jbe@...gutronix.de>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v6 2/6] dsa: lan9303: move Turbo Mode bit init

> > In preparing to remove the .adjust_link api, I am moving the one-time
> > initialization of the device's Turbo Mode bit into a different execution
> > path. This code clears (disables) the Turbo Mode bit which is never used
> > by this driver. Turbo Mode is a non-standard mode that would allow the
> > 100Mbps RMII interface to run at 200Mbps.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Ray <jerry.ray@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c | 15 ++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> > index 5a21fc96d479..50470fb09cb4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
> > @@ -886,6 +886,12 @@ static int lan9303_check_device(struct lan9303 *chip)
> >               return ret;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /* Virtual Phy: Remove Turbo 200Mbit mode */
> > +     lan9303_read(chip->regmap, LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_CTRL, &reg);
> > +
> > +     reg &= ~LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_TURBO;
> > +     regmap_write(chip->regmap, LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_CTRL, reg);
> > +
> 
> Isn't a function whose name is lan9303_check_device() being abused for
> this purpose (device initialization)?
> 
I will move this into lan9303_setup.

Regards,
Jerry.

> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1050,7 +1056,6 @@ static int lan9303_phy_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int phy, int regnum,
> >  static void lan9303_adjust_link(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> >                               struct phy_device *phydev)
> >  {
> > -     struct lan9303 *chip = ds->priv;
> >       int ctl;
> >
> >       if (!phy_is_pseudo_fixed_link(phydev))
> > @@ -1073,14 +1078,6 @@ static void lan9303_adjust_link(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> >               ctl &= ~BMCR_FULLDPLX;
> >
> >       lan9303_phy_write(ds, port, MII_BMCR, ctl);
> > -
> > -     if (port == chip->phy_addr_base) {
> > -             /* Virtual Phy: Remove Turbo 200Mbit mode */
> > -             lan9303_read(chip->regmap, LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_CTRL, &ctl);
> > -
> > -             ctl &= ~LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_TURBO;
> > -             regmap_write(chip->regmap, LAN9303_VIRT_SPECIAL_CTRL, ctl);
> > -     }
> >  }
> >
> >  static int lan9303_port_enable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > --
> > 2.17.1