netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: sch_taprio: fix possible use-after-free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJUJpmeo+SHYbwitQ3A97Sm86P7Yi4TGdkquedxKiO_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:03:02 +0100
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: sch_taprio: fix possible use-after-free

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:41 AM Vinicius Costa Gomes
<vinicius.gomes@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From the commit message, I got the impression that only the one
> qdisc_synchronize() in taprio_destroy() would be needed.
>

This could be, but then why having hrtimer_cancel(&q->advance_timer);
in taprio_reset(), since it is already in taprio_destroy() ?