[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf3c7895be29d46e814d356bb5afad1203815253.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:21:39 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Pietro Borrello <borrello@...g.uniroma1.it>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@...il.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] inet: fix fast path in __inet_hash_connect()
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 13:11 +0000, Pietro Borrello wrote:
> __inet_hash_connect() has a fast path taken if sk_head(&tb->owners) is
> equal to the sk parameter.
> sk_head() returns the hlist_entry() with respect to the sk_node field.
> However entries in the tb->owners list are inserted with respect to the
> sk_bind_node field with sk_add_bind_node().
> Thus the check would never pass and the fast path never execute.
>
> This fast path has never been executed or tested as this bug seems
> to be present since commit 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2"), thus
> remove it to reduce code complexity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pietro Borrello <borrello@...g.uniroma1.it>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - remove the fast path to reduce code complexity
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112-inet_hash_connect_bind_head-v2-1-5ec926ddd985@diag.uniroma1.it
>
> Changes in v2:
> - nit: s/list_entry/hlist_entry/
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112-inet_hash_connect_bind_head-v1-1-7e3c770157c8@diag.uniroma1.it
> ---
> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> index d039b4e732a3..b832e7a545d4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> @@ -994,17 +994,7 @@ int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
> u32 index;
>
> if (port) {
> - head = &hinfo->bhash[inet_bhashfn(net, port,
> - hinfo->bhash_size)];
> - tb = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_bind_hash;
> - spin_lock_bh(&head->lock);
> - if (sk_head(&tb->owners) == sk && !sk->sk_bind_node.next) {
> - inet_ehash_nolisten(sk, NULL, NULL);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&head->lock);
> - return 0;
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> - /* No definite answer... Walk to established hash table */
> + local_bh_disable();
> ret = check_established(death_row, sk, port, NULL);
> local_bh_enable();
> return ret;
LGTM, thanks!
Eric, do you have any additional comment?
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists