[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7qxxvyj.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:05:24 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: "Alexey V. Vissarionov" <gremlin@...linux.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Wataru Gohda <wataru.gohda@...ress.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: Fix allocation size
"Alexey V. Vissarionov" <gremlin@...linux.org> writes:
> The "pkt" is a pointer to struct sk_buff, so it's just 4 or 8
> bytes, while the structure itself is much bigger.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: bbd1f932e7c45ef1 ("brcmfmac: cleanup ampdu-rx host reorder code")
> Signed-off-by: Alexey V. Vissarionov <gremlin@...linux.org>
>
> diff --git
> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
> index 36af81975855c525..0d283456da331464 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
> @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ void brcmf_fws_rxreorder(struct brcmf_if *ifp,
> struct sk_buff *pkt)
> buf_size = sizeof(*rfi);
> max_idx = reorder_data[BRCMF_RXREORDER_MAXIDX_OFFSET];
>
> - buf_size += (max_idx + 1) * sizeof(pkt);
> + buf_size += (max_idx + 1) * sizeof(struct sk_buff);
Wouldn't sizeof(*pkt) be better? Just like with sizeof(*rfi) few lines
above.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists